On 07-Apr-25 22:19, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
Moin,
We had a similar discussion about EH processing for 8504. You’ll see
some text in there about that, as we thought that better than a
dependency on a parallel draft. That “parallel draft” is now only
just in IESG review several years on.
I would say 'both' is a good option here (assuming a notably longer
lead time for 3901bis).
Yes. State the main point in 8504bis and defer the details to the
specialized document.
Brian
I added some language to -02 of the 3901bis,
please take a look and share your thoughts.
With best regards,
Tobias
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
