Moin, > We had a similar discussion about EH processing for 8504. You’ll see > some text in there about that, as we thought that better than a > dependency on a parallel draft. That “parallel draft” is now only > just in IESG review several years on.
I would say 'both' is a good option here (assuming a notably longer lead time for 3901bis). I added some language to -02 of the 3901bis, please take a look and share your thoughts. With best regards, Tobias _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
