Hi, On 04/04/2025, 10:29, "Tobias Fiebig" <tob...@fiebig.nl> wrote:
Moin, On Fri, 2025-04-04 at 08:13 +0000, Tim Chown wrote: > The general principle in 8504 is to be a summary of requirements and > to point to other RFCs that define them, so doing both is perfectly > viable. Fair point; Question is, though, if one would want to basically create a dependency for the publication of 8504bis on 3901bis; Something tells me that it will be a longer road for the latter. ;-) Yes, in this case that would be the downside. We had a similar discussion about EH processing for 8504. You’ll see some text in there about that, as we thought that better than a dependency on a parallel draft. That “parallel draft” is now only just in IESG review several years on. Tim
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
