I've been thinking about this draft since Tuesday and I've changed my mind, and I support the adoption of this draft by DNSOP WG.
It might need some work though before that happens, but let me think about that first for a while, and also read the thread here. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 3. 3. 2025, at 16:53, Kazunori Fujiwara <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> wrote: > > Dear dnsop WG, > > Willem Toorop and I submitted new draft: Clarifications to the DNS Ranking > Data > (draft-fujiwara-dnsop-ranking-data-00.txt). > > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-ranking-data/ > URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-ranking-data-00.txt > > Abstract: > > This document obsoletes Section 5.4.1 (Ranking data) of RFC 2181, and > specifies directives whereby the source of the data determines for > what purposes it may be used. > > We hope that this draft will clarify the handling of DNS data. > > Please review and comment. > > Regards, > > -- > Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
