Just noticed, the linked RFC on DNS Terminology in Section 2 is 8499, not 9499.
Additionally, with the context of public resolvers and other such intermediaries: how is RPZ / DNSBL going to be handled? Local ISPs have been subject to this by law for quite some time now, in a variety of jurisdictions. Public resolvers have also started to become subject to such laws recently. Without going into the policy of such filtering, what would the implications of such filters be in this proposal? More or less by design, they trespass on zone files that the otherwise recursive resolver does not have global authority over. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Michael De Roover Mail: i...@nixmagic.com Web: michael.de.roover.eu.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
