> For me, it's a big issue because .internal is not in the root zone,
> just like zillions of other names that are bit in the root zone.
> >internal has *no* SUDN features that are at all different than
> those zillions.

In my opinion, .internal should get a negative DNSSEC trust anchor. So that
makes it different from all other names that are not in the root zone.

If we decide we don't want a negative trust anchor, then no special processing
is needed, so there would also be no need for a SUDN entry.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to