On Feb 6, 2025, at 10:55, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > (with no hats, and perhaps less sense) > > I agree .internal should be a special use name. I don't see why it's that > big an issue. >
For me, it's a big issue because .internal is not in the root zone, just like zillions of other names that are bit in the root zone. .internal has *no* SUDN features that are at all different than those zillions. If there was a way to put a wildcard entry for the SUDN registry labelled "Names that are not in the root zone", I agree that we should write one; my reading of RFC 6761 is that such an entry is not permitted. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
