Hi Ed, (author hat off) On 12/24/24 21:23, Edward Lewis wrote:
I don’t think the generic TLD restrictions are the bottleneck.
It is a known fact that several gTLDs [1,2] want to do CDS-based automation and have implementations ready, and are waiting for ICANN's blessings for deployment. [1]: https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/icann76/fd/4.5%20Bauland%20-%20CDNSKEY%20Support%20in%20TANGO%20Registry%20Services.pdf [2]: https://centralnic.support/hc/en-gb/articles/5957742209309-Automated-DNSSEC-Configuration-CDS-scanning
Even though there are 3 or 4 times as many gTLDs as ccTLDs, due to backend operator consolidation, there may be more ccTLD operators than gTLD operators (handwaving…and some operators are both). From this, I suspect that CDS has got to be wrapped in something more operator friendly to gain more ccTLD operators before I’d agree that gTLD restrictions are the bottleneck.
I'm not following what the number of ccTLD implementations has to do with gTLD restrictions. Best, Peter -- https://desec.io/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
