Hi Stefan,

Thanks for your feedback. The below fixes will be included in the revised 
submission that will be published soon (probably today or tomorrow).

On 12/27/24 12:09, Stefan Ubbink wrote:
In section 3.2 (Child-specific Method) it says:
"It is also possible to publish child-specific records, where the
wildcard label is replaced by the child's FQDN with the parent zone's labels 
stripped."

I think it would be better to have a text like: "It is also possible to
publish child-specific records, where instead of the wildcard label, a child's FQDN 
with the parent zone's labels stripped, in used."

Good suggestion, we now have:

   It is also possible to publish child-specific records, where in place
   of the wildcard label, the child's FQDN with the parent zone's labels
   stripped is used.

In section 4 the text contains "parent registry", where most of the rest of the text uses 
"parent operator". Is this intentional? I would think using "parent operator" everywhere 
in the document would make it better.

Registry is usually avoided because it is not a DNS term. OTOH, in Section 4, "operator" 
doesn't seem right to me, because the zone operator could be some entity different from the 
registry, which is why we used "registry". But you're right, it's an ugly inconsistency.

We've fixed it by using "parent side" in this section (e.g., "the child DNS operator 
generally is unaware of whether the parent side consumes CDS records or prefers CDNSKEY"). 
Hope that addresses the concern!

In section 4.2.1 I wonder why MUST the agent domain be a subordinate or
equal to one of the NS hostnames?
Maybe I am missing a good reason why it cannot be just a hostname
listing for reports.

I added:

   This is to prevent malicious
   senders from causing the NOTIFY recipient to send unsolicited report
   queries to unrelated third parties.

Section 4.3 (Processing of NOTIFY Messages):
Would it be useful to add "The report query will be out of bound of the NOTIFY query 
and response sequence" or similar to the section that talks about the EDNS0 
Report-Channel?

Fair! We added:

       Reporting may be done
       asynchronously (outside of the NOTIFY transaction).

Best,
Peter

--
https://desec.io/

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to