Jen, Thanks. Despite the reference to DNSSEC in the title, I think the life cycle concepts apply to the use of algorithms in all settings.
Steve On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 1:52 PM Jen Linkova <furr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 11:26 PM Steve Crocker <st...@shinkuro.com> wrote: > >> Documenting and Managing DNSSEC Algorithm Lifecycles >> draft-crocker-dnsop-dnssec-algorithm-lifecycle-01 >> > > >> I noted during the DNSOP session yesterday that two algorithms were >> selected for deprecation. I believe the message below pertains to one of >> them. As noted in the life cycle document, the process of downgrading the >> use of an algorithm should go through three(!) phases. As described in the >> I-D, a sequence of three actions is described: Phaseout, Deprecation, >> Obsolescence. >> (Feel free to propose alternative words that are grammatically parallel.). >> The text is quoted below. >> >> Questions for the DNSOP WG re moving an algorithm to "deprecate" status: >> >> 1. Does moving an algorithm to "deprecate" state exactly match any of >> the actions listed in the lifecycle draft? If so, which one? If not, why >> not? >> >> > draft-buraglio-deprecate7050 has nothing to do with DNSSEC (well, one of > the problem of RFC7050 is that it's don't work with DNSSEC), so I'm not > sure the DNSSEC algorithms lifecycle terminology applies here. > > I agree that we might think about wording (e.g. call it "Discouraging" > instead of "Deprecation"). > > I believe that the Redhat incident scenario is not really applicable here, > as the draft only recommends that operators provide other methods > (non-DNS-based), and hosts using those methods when available. > > >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org> >> Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 7:00 PM >> Subject: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-buraglio-deprecate7050 in >> state "Candidate for WG Adoption" >> To: <dnsop-cha...@ietf.org>, <dnsop@ietf.org>, < >> draft-buraglio-deprecate7...@ietf.org> >> >> >> >> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-buraglio-deprecate7050 in state >> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski) >> >> The document is available at >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buraglio-deprecate7050/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org >> >> >> -- >> Sent by a Verified >> [image: Sent by a Verified sender] >> <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> >> sender >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org >> > > > -- > Cheers, Jen Linkova > -- Sent by a Verified [image: Sent by a Verified sender] <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> sender
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
