Il giorno mar 23 lug 2024 alle ore 08:16 Scott Johnson < sc...@spacelypackets.com> ha scritto:
> Hi Lorenzo, > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2024, Lorenzo Breda wrote: > > > I don't like the way this system permits the same name to refer to > > different resources on different planets. > > It is not one of my favorite aspects either, but, at present, it is the > only concept that will actually work that I am aware of. I look at it > like a phone call to another country. One must first prepend the country > code. This is not necessary for calls made to the same number from the > same country. > Yes, but a lot of content we access on the Internet contains URIs. This proposed DNS system potentially lets me reach a web resource on the web from another planet, but the URIs referenced by the resource could be broken, could reference a legit different resource or could even be spoofed. The phone communication doesn't transmit phone numbers. > > A suggestion was made to me by Shota Suzuki from the WIDE project; > the idea being that we exclusively use new discrete TLDs on other worlds > to disambiguate. I find this suggestion interesting, if Shota is willing > to > expound upon it? > > > It would probably be better > > to default on the Earth all the "old" TLDs, to avoid breaking URIs. > > I am not sure I understand your point here. I understand the complexity > and expense required to add TLDs to the terrestrial DNS network in modern > times. It has been noted that new TLD's on Earth need not be created; 3rd > level domain mapping can also work. That said, new TLDs (moon, luna, > mars, europa, etc) which wildcard point to gateways/exchanges are the only > change suggested to the terrestrial DNS system. This model allows > identical configurations (albeit with different root zone data) everywhere > it is deployed. > My point is avoiding the ambiguity. ietf.org would be the same resource both on the Earth and on Mars (referencing the Earth website). > > > This system is built to make planetary networks exchange data, I'd > > avoid URIs contained in the data changing their meaning in the process. > > The local phone switch drops the country code or area code extension upon > receipt. I see this no differently... upon entering the BP network, the > request metadata is trimmed to allow normal operation on the remote end. > I am not married to this, but have not seen an alternate proposal that > works. Again, not a fan of exchanging information that have a different meaning (URIs that reference different resources) on the two ends of the information exchange. -- Lorenzo Breda
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
