Hi Bryce,
Interesting. This is the second reply which wishes to use reverse DNS in
this fashion, the first being from Rick Taylor. The thing is, reverse DNS
is not exactly a user facing function. One goal of this effort is to
allow interoperability across worlds with a similar user experience, based
on similar concepts and primitives.
If you were to ask around the office, most folks working with you
understand how to access a URL with a domain name. Similarly, most will
never have heard of reverse DNS, and what it is used for. I am sure you
see the issue here.
I agree that reverse DNS mappings could be a useful part of the BP naming
ecosystem, just as dedicated RRTYPEs will be. What is unclear is how this
will make for an understood and familiar experience for the off-world
internet user?
Thanks,
ScottJ
On Mon, 22 Jul 2024, Nordgren, Bryce - FS, MT wrote:
Just spitballing, but instead of a new TLD, what about
"{earth,moon,mars}.sol.arpa" as your suffix?
This seems like it's right in the wheelhouse of the "Address Resolution
Parameter Area"...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.arpa
Forest Service Shield
Bryce Nordgren, FRIT
Physical Scientist
Forest Service
Missoula Fire Science Lab
p: 406-829-6955
c: 406-396-4147
bryce.l.nordg...@usda.gov
5775 Hwy 10 W
Missoula, MT 59808
www.fs.fed.us
USDA Logo Forest Service Twitter USDA Facebook
Caring for the land and serving people
_______________________________________________________________________
From: Scott Johnson <sc...@spacelypackets.com>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2024 3:00 AM
To: d...@ietf.org <d...@ietf.org>; dnsop@ietf.org <dnsop@ietf.org>
Cc: ipnsig...@googlegroups.com <ipnsig...@googlegroups.com>;
awg-ipn...@googlegroups.com <awg-ipn...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [dtn] An Interplanetary DNS Model
Hi Everyone,
Sorry for the 4-way cross posting, but I wanted to reach all of those
parties who may have interest.
I have published an internet-draft version of a document I have been
privately publishing, in order that the community may understand, pick
apart, improve, and fill in the blanks. This is in response to
community
interest and related efforts, in order that we best arrive at a
standardized practice and architecture for Interplanetary Internet
communications. I welcome and look forward to comments which could
help
us reach this laudable goal. I am not sure of the exact venue for WG
adoption, given the scope of the concepts. As such will I refrain from
asking for WG adoption at this time, pending discussion from the DTN
and
DNS communities.
Please find the draft here:
https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata
tracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-johnson-interplanetary-dns%2F&data=05%
7C02%7Cbryce.l.nordgren%40usda.gov%7Ca6aa16d3a3434c34031208dcaa2d44ba
%7Ced5b36e701ee4ebc867ee03cfa0d4697%7C1%7C0%7C638572358631001081%7CUn
known%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1ha
WwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=BTPmN%2B7FDxrLZPRDDZZoD6YNKHG1d5
ROtFlDjqZg1Vs%3D&reserved=0
I would also be interested in revisiting Marc Blanchet's smtp and http
over BP related drafts in the light of the above document, to see if
adaptation can be made to make these efforts dovetail together.
Thanks to all,
Scott Johnson
Spacely Packets, LCC
_______________________________________________
dtn mailing list -- d...@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dtn-le...@ietf.org
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA
solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of
this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains
may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal
penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender and delete the email immediately.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
