> On 10. 7. 2024, at 15:36, Yorgos Thessalonikefs <yor...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > > In general having limits in an RFC that people can point to goes a long way > than developers trying to argue with users; for example on what a sensible > length of a CNAME chain is.
I agree with this rationale, but I would rather frame any document more like “if you are doing this things might not work” rather than saying “these are hard limits”. In any case, any document like this is doomed to fail unless you can get the DNS Silos to sign it with their own blood, because any rational argument will be shot down with “but it works with …”. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
