On 09/07/2024 11:06, Kazunori Fujiwara wrote:
Dear DNSOP, I submitted new draft that proposes to consider "Upper limit value for DNS". If you are interested, please read and comment it.
I disagree with the rationale for 13 name servers. The root (and .com) have that because it was what would fit into packets of a particular size given their naming scheme and that scheme's efficient compressibility. If there is to be a recommended limit, it should be specifically for packet size reasons, and not just "because this is what the root does". IIRC, Vixie et al wrote a draft on this, but it didn't reach RFC status. Ah, there it is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-15.txt Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
