On Mon, 24 Jun 2024, Joe Abley wrote:
It seems like it would be nice to be able to implement future new RRTypes like WALLET simply by adding an RRType to an array of RRTypes that are all implemented the same way, rather than writing new parsers for every one of them. It would also make applicants' lives easier since they could say "I want cookie-cutter WALLET" and not have to think about the consequences of how they define their RDATA. Of course there's some XKCD-927 risk in this approach.
Ahem. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-dnsextlang/ and https://pypi.org/project/dnsextlang/
Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
