On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 01:27:00PM -0700, Shumon Huque <shu...@gmail.com> wrote a message of 236 lines which said:
> > * is there an EDE which is recommended when replying to an > > explicit request for a meta-type (like QTYPE=NXNAME)? > > It doesn't, but could. I don't see an obviously applicable EDE code that > covers this (apart from the catch-all "Other Error"), so perhaps we could > define a new one, "Invalid Query Type"? Currently, I use 18, Prohibited, which is not perfect. > One current implementation does not differentiate DO=0 vs 1 and gives the > same NODATA answer for both cases. Yes. I see no practical problem with that but, from a philosophical point of view, it disturbs me. Naive clients may make wrong conclusions from the NODATA answer. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
