Hi Shumon et al., On 3/5/24 08:15, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-03.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
I added a PR with some suggestions here: https://github.com/shuque/id-dnssec-compact-lies/pull/3 The PR just has the suggestions, with no rationale. If anything's contentious or the rationale less obvious than I thought: apologies; happy to provide it! Also, two questions: Section 2: An alternative way to distinguish NXDOMAIN from ENT is to define the synthetic Resource Record type for ENTs [...] This typically imposes less work on the server since NXDOMAIN responses are a lot more common than ENTs. Not sure in what regard this is "less" work -- an NSEC record has to be signed in any case? Section 4.1 This section describes an optional but recommended scheme How do "optional" and "recommended" relate to the corresponding uppercase keywords (which don't apply at the same time)? Best, Peter -- https://desec.io/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
