so yet again, I voice things which show my ignorance, not yours. I thank you for the gentle clue-stick hit, it was educational.
-G On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:24 PM Shumon Huque <shu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:01 AM Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: >> >> >> > On 27 Feb 2024, at 15:53, George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> wrote: >> > >> > Not in any way to stop this specific draft, I wonder if this is a more >> > general principle of exercising code points which are not marked >> > "never to be used" and should also be raised cross-area, or in another >> > place? >> > >> > Maybe the best path is to get this proved here, and then embrace-extend. >> >> Sure there are a lot of places where this should be done. This is going >> to cover DNS. > > > Yup, and although Mark and I have been mulling this for DNS for a number > of years now, the general principle has also been discussed elsewhere (see > the references to greasing) and RFC 8701 describes greasing for TLS. > > We should track that work too, but this draft can focus on the DNS use case. > > Shumon. > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
