> On 27 Feb 2024, at 15:53, George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> wrote: > > Not in any way to stop this specific draft, I wonder if this is a more > general principle of exercising code points which are not marked > "never to be used" and should also be raised cross-area, or in another > place? > > Maybe the best path is to get this proved here, and then embrace-extend.
Sure there are a lot of places where this should be done. This is going to cover DNS. > I tend not to what-if the downsides, but I can imagine there would be > an initially high rate of failure which causes log flows, threat > analysis feeds and some consequent damage. That would have to be a > "lesson learned" and then we pass through to a better understanding of > which bits in a header are mutable and should not be tested as fixed > value fields. Ednscomp.isc.org, as is mentioned in the draft, has been testing this for years now. You don’t need to speculate. You can go view the behaviour patterns. > Nice, small draft. > > -G > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:29 AM Shumon Huque <shu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> Mark Andrews and I have submitted a new draft on 'Greasing Protocol >> Extension Points in the DNS'. >> >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-huque-dnsop-grease-00.html >> >> (datatracker link: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huque-dnsop-grease/ ) >> >> We'd like to see if there is interest in working on this. On list and >> in-person (IETF119/Brisbane) discussion welcome. >> >> Shumon (and Mark). >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
