I will say that I am curious to know who has or is planning to deploy this.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 8:24 AM Martine Sophie Lenders < martine.lend...@tu-dresden.de> wrote: > Hi Jerry, > > On 16.11.23 13:36, Jerry Lundström wrote: > > Hi Martine, > > > > On 11/16/23 11:51, Martine Sophie Lenders wrote: > >> > >> Regarding DNSSEC: We discussed this in the context of our research > >> project already, and there exists a rough, private draft for an > >> extension for the CBOR format. We still need to look into more detail > >> if and how sensible it is to get this into the mainline format. > > > > My point here was, unless you're suppose to run (for example) Unbound on > > a CoAP device using DNS-over-CoAP then there is no need to full support > > DNS wire-format in CBOR. From the presentation it did not sound like > > this but then again I know very little about CoAP environments. > > > > Going down this path, to fully support DNS wire-format in another > > format, feels a lot like cloning the camel. > > > > Please don't clone the camel! > > I might be cloning a camel, so to say, but I also throw out a bunch of > genes that are not expressed in that particular camel anyway and half > the number of base pairs in that process. ;-) > > Cheers > Martine > > > > > Cheers, > > Jerry > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DNSOP mailing list > > DNSOP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
