Hopefully, this fixed the reference mistake. (This is technically draft-00 but my making multiple mistakes and re-uploading this caused this to be a draft-03 now)
Momoka ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org> Date: Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 3:28 AM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-03.txt To: Momoka Yamamoto <momoka....@gmail.com>, Tobias Fiebig < tfie...@mpi-inf.mpg.de> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Momoka Yamamoto and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis Revision: 03 Title: DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines Date: 2023-10-20 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 9 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-03.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis/ HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-03.html HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-03 Abstract: This memo provides guidelines and documents Best Current Practice for operating authoritative and recursive DNS servers given that queries and responses are carried in a mixed environment of IPv4 and IPv6 networks. It expands beyond [RFC3901] in so far that it now considers the reality of progressing IPv4 exhaustion, which will make IPv6-only resolvers necessary in the long-term. This document obsoletes RFC 3901. (if approved) On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 3:12 AM Momoka Yamamoto <momoka....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello DNSOP Working Group, > > My name is Momoka Yamamoto and I've recently submitted an Internet-Draft > titled "DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines" > (draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-00) with my co-author Tobias > tfie...@mpi-inf.mpg.de. This draft discusses the operational guidelines > for operating authoritative and recursive DNS servers in mixed IPv4 and > IPv6 environments, expanding on RFC3910 to address the progressing IPv4 > exhaustion and the long-term necessity of IPv6-only resolvers. > > I would greatly appreciate any feedback, comments, or questions you may > have regarding this draft. I believe this document could contribute > significantly to the current discussions and work of the DNSOP working > group, especially in light of the wide adoption of IPv6 over the last 20 > years since BCP91 was written. > > The draft is open for discussion and I am looking forward to engaging with > the community to refine and improve it. > > Momoka Y > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org> > Date: Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 3:02 AM > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-00.txt > To: Momoka Yamamoto <momoka....@gmail.com>, Tobias Fiebig < > tfie...@mpi-inf.mpg.de> > > > A new version of Internet-Draft draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-00.txt has been > successfully submitted by Momoka Yamamoto and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis > Revision: 00 > Title: DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines > Date: 2023-10-20 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 9 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-00.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis/ > HTML: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-00.html > HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis > > > Abstract: > > This memo provides guidelines and documents Best Current Practice for > operating authoritative and recursive DNS servers given that queries > and responses are carried in a mixed environment of IPv4 and IPv6 > networks. It expands beyond [RFC3910] in so far that it now > considers the reality of progressing IPv4 exhaustion, which will make > IPv6-only resolvers necessary in the long-term. > > Discussion Venues > > This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. > > Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at > https://github.com/momoka0122y/draft-dnsop-3901bis. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
