>> On the other hand, spending a week or two repeating a cycle to get an >> important term in the current document seems like a better solution.
> If the WG agrees that this is an important term, sure. Well, if the IETF has consensus :) I'm raising the issue during this last call that "round-robin" should be in the list of defined terms. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
