Op 16 sep. 2023 om 03:02 heeft Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> het volgende geschreven:
> On the other hand, spending a week or two repeating a cycle to get an > important term in the current document seems like a better solution. For an important omission that does seem like it would be a sensible thing to do, better than waiting for a successor to this document. However, I don't think the lack of a definition for this particular term is an important omission. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
