>> Perhaps if we inverted the logic? I realize this does broaden the >> fundamental definition but what if, instead of saying "gave >> non-authoritative response" we define lame as "failed to give an >> authoritatve/AA response"?
jtk> Isn't that what I originally suggested and Joe disagreed with? jtk> Let's trust P. Hoffman to iron this all out in a revision of the jtk> definitions RFC. :-) Yup. I agree with you that this is the operationally most useful and simplest way to think of it. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
