On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 14:35:36 +0000 Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote:
> I continue to think that if you don't get a response, you can't tell > whether the delegation is lame. Lameness (as I use the term) relates > the configuration of the nameserver, not it's availability. > > So I prefer Duane's formulation to yours, precisely for the reason > you gave. I won't push on this any further after this, but the absence of a response happens quite a bit in my experience, and it is often a lame delegation in my view due to a problem in the delegating config or apex config (e.g., bogus or stale address specified, system removed from service but config not updated). A mention of this ambiguity, that it might be lame, might not be a bad idea to cover those cases imo. John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
