On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:29:36 -0600 Paul Ebersman <list-dn...@dragon.net> wrote:
> Perhaps if we inverted the logic? I realize this does broaden the > fundamental definition but what if, instead of saying "gave > non-authoritative response" we define lame as "failed to give an > authoritatve/AA response"? Isn't that what I originally suggested and Joe disagreed with? Let's trust P. Hoffman to iron this all out in a revision of the definitions RFC. :-) John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
