On Sep 8, 2022, at 8:35 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> This is a bug fix, the proposed behaviour makes no sense when $QNAME
> is the unaltered (attrleaf prefixed) starting point.  The current
> meaning was not intended.  If the edit can be made without any
> major process, just a note to the RFC editor, it'll save errata,
> and possible confusion later.

A technical change made after the IESG review requires, at a minimum, another 
IESG review. The IESG could ask for another IETF review, if they want. It's up 
to Warren, the responsible AD, to decide if that's "major process". 

--Paul Hoffman

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to