> Yes, and catching COVID on Friday didn't help. Will attempt to send a > pull request for just the $QNAME fix shortly.
Making a pull request does not preclude also Cc'ing the list. Which is what I'm doing now and was planning to do in any case: https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/399/files --- a/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https.md +++ b/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https.md @@ -532,12 +532,13 @@ noted in {{client-failures}} and {{ech-client-behavior}}). SVCB-optional clients SHOULD issue in parallel any other DNS queries that might be needed for connection establishment if the SVCB record is absent, in order to minimize delay in that case and enable the optimizations discussed in {{optimizations}}. Once SVCB resolution has concluded, whether successful or not, +if at least one AliasMode record was processed, SVCB-optional clients SHALL append to the priority list an endpoint consisting of the final value of $QNAME, the authority endpoint's port number, and no SvcParams. (This endpoint will be attempted before falling back to non-SVCB connection modes. This ensures that SVCB-optional clients will make use of an AliasMode record whose TargetName has A and/or AAAA records but no SVCB records.) -- VIktor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop