On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:45:28AM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
>
>
> > On 29 Jul 2021, at 10:33 am, Mark Delany <m...@india.emu.st> wrote:
> >
> > On 29Jul21, Geoff Huston allegedly wrote:
> >
> >> For me it appears to depend on the actions of the resolver as to whether
> >> this would be faster
> >> or not. If all resolvers blindly re-query using TCP for all UDP responses
> >> where TC=1 is seen in
> >
> > I'm not sure I follow this bit. Are you merely implying that the resolver
> > should first
> > consider a larger edns0 bufsize before resorting to TCP?
>
> Seems that the DNS Flag Day 2020 precluded that option, so I don’t think its
> available.
I think we should simplify the number of ways we do something,
be it edns0 or tcp. We are seeing the difference in everyone wanting
their own way/transport/whatnot and therefore keep growing the methods
to get the same data.
But yes, as we increase the default answer size with additional
glue, signatures, validation, we should be following and sizing as
appropriate.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
