On Wed, 28 Jul 2021, Geoff Huston wrote:
i.e. amend section 3 to read:...
3. Recommendations
This document clarifies RFC1034 in that in-bailiwick [RFC8499] glue (being part
of all
available glue records) MUST be returned in referral responses, and there is a
requirement
to set TC=1 if all in-bailiwick glue cannot fit in the response.
I think the reasons for returning non-in-bailiwick are the same as for
in-bailiwick glue. You want to give the client as many DNS servers as
possible to increase resilience of the zone. What is your argument for
making this less resilient?
Section 5 deviates away from protocol requirements into registry practice and
the deviation appears to be at best a somewhat random thought!
It makes no sense to me to even include sections 4 or 5 in this document.
I guess what the document is trying to say is "this glue that is not
optional also applies to records that are technically not glue because
it is authoritative data". We really only want to mention that these
should still be added and TC=1 should still be set if it does not fit.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
