Hi, This is a good document and I support publication.
However, I do have some comments. I scanned the Last Call comments by others, and they mostly seem like improvements, but some of my comments below may duplicate others for which I apologize in advance. Section 3, last paragraph: Cut out wishy-washy superfluous words. Be bold! OLD vice-versa. However, it is the aim of this document to argue that BETTER vice-versa. However, this document argues that BEST vice-versa. However, Although Cookies are mentioned in this draft with a reference to the RFC 7873, it would be good to work in the point that the Cookies RFC recommends use of TCP whenever Cookies are not available as a way to get some of the benefits of Cookies. Thus, if I remember correctly, someone following that RFC would use Cookies or, when they are not available, TCP. Section 9, last paragraph: Don't be so negative :-) "not unlike" -> "similar to" Make the name of Section 2 a bit more explicit, something like "History of DNS over TCP" Section 1.1: Update as per RFC 8174. Lots of references are good but I find it disturbing that all technical references are shown as Informational. I think a lot of them should be moved to Normative. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 7:17 PM Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > > This message starts the Working Group Last Call for > draft-ietf-dnsop-tcp-requirements > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements/) > > Since this draft has not been recently discussed in the WG, we figure people > might need to swap it back in, and we’re requesting BCP status. So the WGLC > will end in three weeks (instead of the usual two), on 3 May. > > Substantive comments to the list, please. It’s fine for minor edits to go > direct to the authors. > > We’d like to advance this but it needs some active support, so we need to > hear from folks who have found it useful, especially implementers. > > > Thanks, > Suzanne > For the chairs > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
