Hi,

This is a good document and I support publication.

However, I do have some comments. I scanned the Last Call comments by
others, and they mostly seem like improvements, but some of my
comments below may duplicate others for which I apologize in advance.


Section 3, last paragraph: Cut out wishy-washy superfluous words. Be bold!
OLD
vice-versa.  However, it is the aim of this document to argue that
BETTER
vice-versa.  However, this document argues that
BEST
vice-versa.  However,


Although Cookies are mentioned in this draft with a reference to the
RFC 7873, it would be good to work in the point that the Cookies RFC
recommends use of TCP whenever Cookies are not available as a way to
get some of the benefits of Cookies. Thus, if I remember correctly,
someone following that RFC would use Cookies or, when they are not
available, TCP.


Section 9, last paragraph: Don't be so negative :-)
"not unlike" -> "similar to"


Make the name of Section 2 a bit more explicit, something like
"History of DNS over TCP"


Section 1.1: Update as per RFC 8174.


Lots of references are good but I find it disturbing that all
technical references are shown as Informational. I think a lot of them
should be moved to Normative.


Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e...@gmail.com

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 7:17 PM Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
>
> This message starts the Working Group Last Call for 
> draft-ietf-dnsop-tcp-requirements 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements/)
>
> Since this draft has not been recently discussed in the WG, we figure people 
> might need to swap it back in, and we’re requesting BCP status. So the WGLC 
> will end in three weeks (instead of the usual two), on 3 May.
>
> Substantive comments to the list, please. It’s fine for minor edits to go 
> direct to the authors.
>
> We’d like to advance this but it needs some active support, so we need to 
> hear from folks who have found it useful, especially implementers.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Suzanne
> For the chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to