(no hats on) I've read this, and I agree it should move forward. Should there be a reference to RFC8499 in here as well?
(with chairs hat on) Mr Finch made some editorial nits that I concur with. I also ran the Nits tool and found several outdated references, among other things. I've requested that the authors fix these up before it ends up heading to the IESG. tim On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 7:17 PM Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > > This message starts the Working Group Last Call > for draft-ietf-dnsop-tcp-requirements ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements/) > > Since this draft has not been recently discussed in the WG, we figure > people might need to swap it back in, and we’re requesting BCP status. So > the WGLC will end in three weeks (instead of the usual two), on 3 May. > > Substantive comments to the list, please. It’s fine for minor edits to go > direct to the authors. > > We’d like to advance this but it needs some active support, so we need to > hear from folks who have found it useful, especially implementers. > > > Thanks, > Suzanne > For the chairs > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
