On Apr 18, 2021, at 4:17 PM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: > We’d like to advance this but it needs some active support, so we need to > hear from folks who have found it useful, especially implementers.
It is indeed useful, and should be published. However, the wording in the draft needs to be updated about living in the world where TCP is already required. RFC 7766 has been a standard for over five years, but some parts of draft-ietf-dnsop-tcp-requirements, notably the abstract and introduction, use words that indicate that support for TCP is not necessary mandated. All this text should be updated before the document goes to IETF Last Call. If others agree, I would be happy to help the authors find and replace the weak requirements language. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
