On Sun, 27 Dec 2020, Tim Wicinski wrote:
How about instead of loosening the requirement, we take the top 64 values,
allocate them as
either Experimental or FCFS, and it is explicitly noted NOT REQUIRED (or NO ONE
WILL IMPLEMENT
THESE FOR YOU).
That would leave the registry with the strict requirements and allow items to
get code points.
Too simple an answer?
I think this is the best solution. There just will be nation state
crypto, and this allows those to exist. And we still keep control
of limiting the international ciphers by the IETF to the small
subset we think is good, hopefully preventing new long tails of
obsolete ciphers.
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
