On Dec 11, 2020, at 8:26 AM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This draft was present at IETF108 and IETF109. There was interest in adopting > this, but I do recall that implementors had some concerns about this. > However, there was enough interest in starting an adoption > call on this. > > > > Because of the holiday, I'm going to run this call until the 31st, to allow > folks to discuss. > > This starts a Call for Adoption for: draft-hoffman-dnssec-iana-cons > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-dnssec-iana-cons/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by > DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends: 31 December 2020
I'd like to see this adopted by the WG so that the GOST document can proceed forward. I'm also quite interested to hear input from developers about how they feel affected by the different options for documentation of algorithms for DNSSEC. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
