Nice! You didn't name the entity/company, so I won't ask. But I am mildly curious about why they never brought the proposal to the regext working group.
Shumon. On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:24 PM Patrick Mevzek <mev...@uniregistry.com> wrote: > On 22/04/2020 16:01, Shumon Huque wrote: > > Yeah, that was what I thought. I just wasn't sure whether some EPP TTL > > setting extension had been proposed or developed. > > There is in fact at least one to my knowledge :-) > It allows to add that payload to a domain create: > > <extension> > <ttl:create xmlns:ttl="..."> > <ttl:secs>300</ttl:secs> > </ttl:create> > </extension> > > To do something similar during a domain update, and retrieve it during > domain info in EPP: > > <extension> > <ttl:infData xmlns:ttl="..."> > <ttl:secs>3600</ttl:secs> > </ttl:infData> > </extension> > > However, and still as far as I know: > > - it has never been discussed in the IETF WG about EPP > - I do not see any registry using it, including the registry that drafted > it > - the website where it was posted is not active any more, so besides my > own open source EPP client that implements it (I have a knack of doing > every EPP extension possible out there), I know nothing else about it. > The company's gitlab does not reference it anymore either. > > HTH, > > -- > Patrick Mevzek >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
