On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:51 PM Bob Harold <rharo...@umich.edu> wrote:
> Having read through the draft, and twice through the emails, I think the > draft has the right balance in using the parent and child NS RRsets > properly. > > I think the "extra" query for the child NS, sent once per parent TTL, is a > savings over the older method of sending the NS records as "additional > data" in every response. > >> >> Thank you Bob. I just want to qualify your last observation a bit - the extra query would be once per minimum of parent and child TTL, roughly. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
