> On Jan 15, 2020, at 12:14 AM, Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org> wrote: > > Duane, > > Honestly thinking about it more, I'm not even sure we should consider > supporting an incremental version of zone digests in ZONEMD at all.
I could be easily convinced to take that route. The first few revisions of the draft were designed that way. WG discussion back then seemed to focus a lot on the need for having it work with incremental updates. I felt that it could be accommodated with the addition of an extra field and some future work to hammer out the details. > There's no harm in introducing a new type with its own syntax and semantics > if we tackle that problem in the future. Yes, I think that is a perfectly reasonable approach. Brian mentioned some potential complications, and I'll respond to his message. DW
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
