Michael StJohns <m...@nthpermutation.com> writes: > This is sort of what I meant. Still trying to get the authors to home > in a definition for small/static and large/dynamic.
Random thought while reading the thread: we could state something very small and simple rather than trying to approximate the future growth in computing and DNS data sizes simultaneously. Instead we could say something simple like (word smithing needed) "ZONEMD is likely not a suitable solution for zones where the calculations required to create the record on the DNS operator's infrastructure takes longer than 1/10th the average zone update frequency." -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
