On Jan 7, 2020, at 6:03 PM, Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> wrote: > I don't object to the intended status (standards track). There are reports of > multiple independent implementations included in the document, which seems > pleasing and proper.
Definitely proper. The calls for making this RFC "experimental" go against the definition for that designation in RFC 2026, Section 4.2.1. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
