On 1/7/20 3:15 AM, Michael StJohns wrote: >>> >>> 1) A recommendation for the maximum size of the zone [...] >> I am reluctant to add this. As John said, I think it won't age well. >> [...] > > As I suggested in one of my messages, giving an idea of how long it > takes to digest various sizes of zones given commodity hardware would > be a good start. [...]
Well, if you include particulars in those performance examples: BIND 9.X, zone size Y, CPU Z. But to me this doesn't seem very suitable for a static document like RFC standard, and I'd primarily want to see such examples in docs of the servers, as there they can be kept up to date. Still, I see no real harm in putting some performance example(s) into RFC appendix, and they may just become irrelevant over time. --Vladimir
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
