Re: [DNSOP] [dns-privacy] [Doh] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients

[Michael Sinatra]

On 3/13/19 6:17 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> Those seem like unrelated (and repetitive) points, except for your
> attempt to try equate (I assume) a browser using DoH with malware.> That's 
> the kind of overblown statement that detracts from any other
> reasonable points you may make (for me at least).

No, that's not quite it.  My point is that lots of people who support
DoH say that this cat is already out of the bag.  My point is to agree
with Paul and Jim and others who have noted that it's a matter of scale
and legitimization as a proposed standard that *differentiates* DoH from
malware.

Apologies if my previous post was too wordy or repetitive, so I'll just
sum it up: I question the assumption, made in these threads, that DoH
affords users more control.

thanks,
michael

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop