On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:13 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:06:21AM -0700, > Ted Hardie <ted.i...@gmail.com> wrote > a message of 76 lines which said: > > > This conflicts with SECDISPATCH, which will have a pretty serious impact > on > > who might attend. Scheduling these things is very hard, obviously. Given > > this topic, you may have to move outside the normal agenda time to get a > > reasonable shot at avoiding conflict. > > I avoided conflicts with doh, dprive, dnsop and hrpc but avoiding all > conflicts is close-to-impossible. In the evening, people have > meetings, too. > > I admit I'm not sure that Secdispatch is so important here. The > subject of the side meeting is not security-specific. > It is certainly not only about security, but there are several important security trade-offs in play with these choices. Secdispatch pulls pretty much the entire Security Area, and a conflict seems to me personally very unfortunate in its scope. regards, Ted
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
