On Mar 5, 2019, at 9:39 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So, sorry I added an example set and we rat-holed on those. > > My point is that the recursive reoslver has no idea why an authoritative > is unreachable and that doing anything like sending stale records is > going to cause unintended problems.
Those problems were not intended by the authoritative servers. Not sending stale records will also cause problems not intended by the users of the resolver that is serving stale data. Maybe the draft should add a sentence about this shift of "unintended problems" from authoritative to resolvers in the end of the Abstract, and again in the Introduction. It seems like people in the WG may be missing this shift. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
