"Proposal: Put all recommendations in Section 4, and talk about them (instead of introducing them) in the other sections. That way, a lazy developer who only reads Section 4 will know all the recommendations."
I totally agree here. It also makes it easier if the document passed WGLC and moves along the standards process train. Tim On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:51 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > Following up on my previous message: > > The document is actively confusing about recommendations. > > - Section 4 has the actual update to the RFC 1035, and that update > contains MAY and SHOULD statements. > > - Section 5 is called "Example Method" but also contains recommendations. > > - Section 6, "Implementation Caveats" also has recommendations. A > subsection, "6.1. Implementation Considerations" has more recommendations. > > Proposal: Put all recommendations in Section 4, and talk about them > (instead of introducing them) in the other sections. That way, a lazy > developer who only reads Section 4 will know all the recommendations. > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
