Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Benjamin's first DISCUSS point. In addition to documenting the privacy considerations, I think it's important for this document to be crystal clear about who is meant to be doing the data collection -- namely, the server operator. There are some statements in the document that otherwise could be construed to be encouraging third-party passive monitoring of DNS traffic without explaining why, which seems like a problem: Section 1: "There has long been a need to collect DNS queries and responses on authoritative and recursive name servers for monitoring and analysis." Section 3: "In an ideal world, it would be optimal to collect full packet captures of all packets going in or out of a name server." _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
