On 28 March 2018 at 14:48, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote:

> matt, the rfc document set is innately time-series. this was seen as a
> strength compared to some "document set in the sky" that would be updated
> periodically with lineouts and additions, like for example legal codes or
> the ARIN PPML. i think you're very close to saying we need the latter in
> addition to the former, and if so, then i agree with you, but this is an
> IETF problem not a DNSOP problem. --paul
>

I think the RFC series as a whole needs to contain both, but I'm not saying
that both should exist simultaneously for any given set of documents within
the RFC series.  I think we've reached a point where the time series for
DNS has become so complex and convoluted that it's time for a reset to make
it readable again.  We can then carry on patching that with time-series
documents if we want, but the rewrite will give us a new baseline that's
coherent and complete, which we don't have today.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to