On 28 March 2018 at 14:48, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > matt, the rfc document set is innately time-series. this was seen as a > strength compared to some "document set in the sky" that would be updated > periodically with lineouts and additions, like for example legal codes or > the ARIN PPML. i think you're very close to saying we need the latter in > addition to the former, and if so, then i agree with you, but this is an > IETF problem not a DNSOP problem. --paul >
I think the RFC series as a whole needs to contain both, but I'm not saying that both should exist simultaneously for any given set of documents within the RFC series. I think we've reached a point where the time series for DNS has become so complex and convoluted that it's time for a reset to make it readable again. We can then carry on patching that with time-series documents if we want, but the rewrite will give us a new baseline that's coherent and complete, which we don't have today.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
