what this means is, if someone sees _TCP in use for some rr type, and they needed something like this for their own new rr type, they should be encouraged to either use _TCP if they find it's the best fit, or use something else if they find that a best fit. they should not worry either away about either reusing, or not reusing, an existing name.
Well, that, too. Either way, it'd be nice to have all the underscore names in one place rather than spread into N places for N record types.
R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
