On 3/26/2018 8:18 AM, Martin Hoffmann wrote:
Which also reminds me: The DANE RRtypes, ie., TLSA, SMIMEA, and OPENPGPKEY all use underscore labels and are currently missing from the initial table in section 3.1.
The table there is for the right-most underscore name, which RFC 6698 seems to constrain to choices that are already list.
The left-most underscore name appears to use a rule that differs from the rule used by SRV, etc. As such, these are second-level names being drawn from the same namespace but without coordination. So it looks like there's a problem, but not with the proposed global registry (for now.)
Yes? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
