+1, there is enough room for us to improve. When I first drafted some idea, I was told that the IETF work is driven by the community. It's good. As one of the co-authors, I'm fairly open for suggestions. But for experimental draft, I'm not sure whether we should stick to the scope of original experiment we have done (hiding the DNS traffic in web traffic ), or expand it for potential usage. I will ask and handle it to the WG people if it is adopted by the WG.
As to the question of performance, we once had done some simple test (http://www.dnsv6lab.net ) . It is not so scary and almost equal to DNS/TCP. I'm glad to see more comprehensive test result if some guys are interested on that. Davey -----邮件原件----- 发件人: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Paul Hoffman 发送时间: 2016年7月13日 3:22 收件人: dnsop 主题: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-dns-wireformat-http Folks, this is a call for WG adoption, not a design exercise. If the WG adopts the document, we will have plenty of opportunity to fine-tune or make major changes. Such as: On 12 Jul 2016, at 11:51, Shane Kerr wrote: > I recognize that HTTP/2 is definitely a better option because of > out-of-order replies, but I worry about requiring it. It's still quite > new and language support may be spotty. But I guess given it's > popularity this shouldn't be a huge problem, so maybe that is a > reasonable recommendation. If this WG adopts the document and then says "but we want to use an older version of the HTTP protocol", we should expect a fair amount of push-back during IETF Last Call. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
